Leader July 2005
Calls for
a Social
means imposing the euro
|
E |
ither Social Europe or a liberal EU
would mean the troubled euro for all EU Member States. Either or both policies would entail them being
common policies across the EU.
Neo-liberalism is just another term for
letting capitalism rip and damn the social consequences. The hyped up conflict
between social Europe and liberal Europe is false but does assume that each of
the 25 Member States would join the eurozone.
The ten new Member States who joined last
year in May are to join the euro according to their accession treaties. That
would leave three countries outside the single currency, Britain, Denmark and
Sweden. The highly unpopular EU state Constitution stipulates that the euro
will be the currency of the EU. So, even these states would have had the euro
imposed if all 25 states had ratified the Treaty for a European Constitution.
As part of the federalists thrust towards an EU state they are stoking up the
subject of a Social Europe and use the single currency as a staging post.
The single market, capital and labour
The long
established definition of the EU single market in which those who work find
themselves is defined as - the free movement of capital, services, goods and
labour. The single currency, or more properly economic and monetary union, is
controlled by the European Central Bank (ECB). The ECB is managed by governors
of national banks of the Member States in euroland. Each of these banks is
separate from the National government and outside the control and influence of
government ministers and accountable to nobody.
A major criteria
of the ECB is to keep inflation down as part of a one policy fits all 13 Member
States - whatever the economic or social effects on these States and the
peoples who live in them.
Add to all this to the Directive on Services and a real quagmire is
formed for trade unions and all who work for their living to walk into. Wages,
conditions of service and social protection will be stripped away.
In contrast if Member States had their own
currencies, they could follow whatever social policy they wished and could let
the exchange rates take the strain. Each country would be able to have policies
to control their economies and social protection within the welfare state.
The alternative to the EU is now firmly on
the agenda as they say. This would involve returning to Member States the
powers to control their own economies and to have once again their own national
currencies. This is the rational way forward out of the present crisis of the
EU and one more reason for demanding the pointless ratification process of the
Constitution be brought to an end.
[Return to Democrat index]
[To subscribe to Democrat] (members receive each issue free through the post)
[Membership form]
[Order form for material]
[Details about our Campaign against Euro-federalism]
[Home page] [top]